Any reason for using "*/" in command "ls -d */" to list directories?

I know there are some other ways to do the same thing, such as

ls -l | grep "^d" 

or

ls -F | grep "/$" 

I am just curious about the reason for adding "*/" after "ls -d". Why simply using "ls -d" not work? Is there any story or tricky stuff behind it?

2

2 Answers

Adding the -d flag simply instructs ls to simply list directory entries rather than their contents. The * given to ls is expanded to all the entries in the current directory, both files and dirs. So ls -d * will list all entries in this directory, without expanding the subdirectories. But if you use */, then bash expands this to only include the directories in this directory. But with just ls */, all the directories will be expanded. Adding the -d flag prevents that, and you get just the directories in this directory.

1

If you use ls -d *, then you will see not just directories, but also files. If you use ls -d */, you will only see directories.

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like