I am a big fan of using dictionaries to format strings. It helps me read the string format I am using as well as let me take advantage of existing dictionaries. For example:
class MyClass: def __init__(self): self.title = 'Title' a = MyClass() print 'The title is %(title)s' % a.__dict__ path = '/path/to/a/file' print 'You put your file here: %(path)s' % locals() However I cannot figure out the python 3.x syntax for doing the same (or if that is even possible). I would like to do the following
# Fails, KeyError 'latitude' geopoint = {'latitude':41.123,'longitude':71.091} print '{latitude} {longitude}'.format(geopoint) # Succeeds print '{latitude} {longitude}'.format(latitude=41.123,longitude=71.091) 09 Answers
Is this good for you?
geopoint = {'latitude':41.123,'longitude':71.091} print('{latitude} {longitude}'.format(**geopoint)) 6To unpack a dictionary into keyword arguments, use **. Also,, new-style formatting supports referring to attributes of objects and items of mappings:
'{0[latitude]} {0[longitude]}'.format(geopoint) 'The title is {0.title}s'.format(a) # the a from your first example 2As Python 3.0 and 3.1 are EOL'ed and no one uses them, you can and should use str.format_map(mapping) (Python 3.2+):
Similar to
str.format(**mapping), except that mapping is used directly and not copied to adict. This is useful if for example mapping is adictsubclass.
What this means is that you can use for example a defaultdict that would set (and return) a default value for keys that are missing:
>>> from collections import defaultdict >>> vals = defaultdict(lambda: '<unset>', {'bar': 'baz'}) >>> 'foo is {foo} and bar is {bar}'.format_map(vals) 'foo is <unset> and bar is baz' Even if the mapping provided is a dict, not a subclass, this would probably still be slightly faster.
The difference is not big though, given
>>> d = dict(foo='x', bar='y', baz='z') then
>>> 'foo is {foo}, bar is {bar} and baz is {baz}'.format_map(d) is about 10 ns (2 %) faster than
>>> 'foo is {foo}, bar is {bar} and baz is {baz}'.format(**d) on my Python 3.4.3. The difference would probably be larger as more keys are in the dictionary, and
Note that the format language is much more flexible than that though; they can contain indexed expressions, attribute accesses and so on, so you can format a whole object, or 2 of them:
>>> p1 = {'latitude':41.123,'longitude':71.091} >>> p2 = {'latitude':56.456,'longitude':23.456} >>> '{0[latitude]} {0[longitude]} - {1[latitude]} {1[longitude]}'.format(p1, p2) '41.123 71.091 - 56.456 23.456' Starting from 3.6 you can use the interpolated strings too:
>>> f'lat:{p1["latitude"]} lng:{p1["longitude"]}' 'lat:41.123 lng:71.091' You just need to remember to use the other quote characters within the nested quotes. Another upside of this approach is that it is much faster than calling a formatting method.
3print("{latitude} {longitude}".format(**geopoint)) 2Since the question is specific to Python 3, here's using the new f-string syntax, available since Python 3.6:
>>> geopoint = {'latitude':41.123,'longitude':71.091} >>> print(f'{geopoint["latitude"]} {geopoint["longitude"]}') 41.123 71.091 Note the outer single quotes and inner double quotes (you could also do it the other way around).
2The Python 2 syntax works in Python 3 as well:
>>> class MyClass: ... def __init__(self): ... self.title = 'Title' ... >>> a = MyClass() >>> print('The title is %(title)s' % a.__dict__) The title is Title >>> >>> path = '/path/to/a/file' >>> print('You put your file here: %(path)s' % locals()) You put your file here: /path/to/a/file 1geopoint = {'latitude':41.123,'longitude':71.091} # working examples. print(f'{geopoint["latitude"]} {geopoint["longitude"]}') # from above answer print('{geopoint[latitude]} {geopoint[longitude]}'.format(geopoint=geopoint)) # alternate for format method (including dict name in string). print('%(latitude)s %(longitude)s'%geopoint) # thanks @tcll 2Most answers formatted only the values of the dict.
If you want to also format the key into the string you can use dict.items():
geopoint = {'latitude':41.123,'longitude':71.091} print("{} {}".format(*geopoint.items())) Output:
('latitude', 41.123) ('longitude', 71.091)
If you want to format in an arbitry way, that is, not showing the key-values like tuples:
from functools import reduce print("{} is {} and {} is {}".format(*reduce((lambda x, y: x + y), [list(item) for item in geopoint.items()]))) Output:
1latitude is 41.123 and longitude is 71.091
Use format_map to do what you want
print('{latitude} {longitude}'.format_map(geopoint)) This has the advantage that
- the dictionary does not have to be blown up into parameters (compared to
**geopoint) and that - the format string only has access to the provided map and not the entire scope of variables (compared to F-strings).