Parsing boolean values with argparse

I would like to use argparse to parse boolean command-line arguments written as "--foo True" or "--foo False". For example:

my_program --my_boolean_flag False 

However, the following test code does not do what I would like:

import argparse parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="My parser") parser.add_argument("--my_bool", type=bool) cmd_line = ["--my_bool", "False"] parsed_args = parser.parse(cmd_line) 

Sadly, parsed_args.my_bool evaluates to True. This is the case even when I change cmd_line to be ["--my_bool", ""], which is surprising, since bool("") evalutates to False.

How can I get argparse to parse "False", "F", and their lower-case variants to be False?

6

24 Answers

I think a more canonical way to do this is via:

command --feature 

and

command --no-feature 

argparse supports this version nicely:

Python 3.9+:

parser.add_argument('--feature', action=argparse.BooleanOptionalAction) 

Python < 3.9:

parser.add_argument('--feature', action='store_true') parser.add_argument('--no-feature', dest='feature', action='store_false') parser.set_defaults(feature=True) 

Of course, if you really want the --arg <True|False> version, you could pass ast.literal_eval as the "type", or a user defined function ...

def t_or_f(arg): ua = str(arg).upper() if 'TRUE'.startswith(ua): return True elif 'FALSE'.startswith(ua): return False else: pass #error condition maybe? 
41

Yet another solution using the previous suggestions, but with the "correct" parse error from argparse:

def str2bool(v): if isinstance(v, bool): return v if v.lower() in ('yes', 'true', 't', 'y', '1'): return True elif v.lower() in ('no', 'false', 'f', 'n', '0'): return False else: raise argparse.ArgumentTypeError('Boolean value expected.') 

This is very useful to make switches with default values; for instance

parser.add_argument("--nice", type=str2bool, nargs='?', const=True, default=False, help="Activate nice mode.") 

allows me to use:

script --nice script --nice <bool> 

and still use a default value (specific to the user settings). One (indirectly related) downside with that approach is that the 'nargs' might catch a positional argument -- see this related question and this argparse bug report.

14

If you want to allow --feature and --no-feature at the same time (last one wins)

This allows users to make a shell alias with --feature, and overriding it with --no-feature.

Python 3.9 and above

parser.add_argument('--feature', default=True, action=argparse.BooleanOptionalAction) 

Python 3.8 and below

I recommend mgilson's answer:

parser.add_argument('--feature', dest='feature', action='store_true') parser.add_argument('--no-feature', dest='feature', action='store_false') parser.set_defaults(feature=True) 

If you DON'T want to allow --feature and --no-feature at the same time

You can use a mutually exclusive group:

feature_parser = parser.add_mutually_exclusive_group(required=False) feature_parser.add_argument('--feature', dest='feature', action='store_true') feature_parser.add_argument('--no-feature', dest='feature', action='store_false') parser.set_defaults(feature=True) 

You can use this helper if you are going to set many of them:

def add_bool_arg(parser, name, default=False): group = parser.add_mutually_exclusive_group(required=False) group.add_argument('--' + name, dest=name, action='store_true') group.add_argument('--no-' + name, dest=name, action='store_false') parser.set_defaults(**{name:default}) add_bool_arg(parser, 'useful-feature') add_bool_arg(parser, 'even-more-useful-feature') 
11

Here is another variation without extra row/s to set default values. The boolean value is always assigned, so that it can be used in logical statements without checking beforehand:

import argparse parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Parse bool") parser.add_argument("--do-something", default=False, action="store_true", help="Flag to do something") args = parser.parse_args() if args.do_something: print("Do something") else: print("Don't do something") print(f"Check that args.do_something={args.do_something} is always a bool.") 
5

oneliner:

parser.add_argument('--is_debug', default=False, type=lambda x: (str(x).lower() == 'true')) 
2

There seems to be some confusion as to what type=bool and type='bool' might mean. Should one (or both) mean 'run the function bool(), or 'return a boolean'? As it stands type='bool' means nothing. add_argument gives a 'bool' is not callable error, same as if you used type='foobar', or type='int'.

But argparse does have registry that lets you define keywords like this. It is mostly used for action, e.g. `action='store_true'. You can see the registered keywords with:

parser._registries 

which displays a dictionary

{'action': {None: argparse._StoreAction, 'append': argparse._AppendAction, 'append_const': argparse._AppendConstAction, ... 'type': {None: <function argparse.identity>}} 

There are lots of actions defined, but only one type, the default one, argparse.identity.

This code defines a 'bool' keyword:

def str2bool(v): #susendberg's function return v.lower() in ("yes", "true", "t", "1") p = argparse.ArgumentParser() p.register('type','bool',str2bool) # add type keyword to registries p.add_argument('-b',type='bool') # do not use 'type=bool' # p.add_argument('-b',type=str2bool) # works just as well p.parse_args('-b false'.split()) Namespace(b=False) 

parser.register() is not documented, but also not hidden. For the most part the programmer does not need to know about it because type and action take function and class values. There are lots of stackoverflow examples of defining custom values for both.


In case it isn't obvious from the previous discussion, bool() does not mean 'parse a string'. From the Python documentation:

bool(x): Convert a value to a Boolean, using the standard truth testing procedure.

Contrast this with

int(x): Convert a number or string x to an integer.

1

A quite similar way is to use:

feature.add_argument('--feature',action='store_true') 

and if you set the argument --feature in your command

 command --feature 

the argument will be True, if you do not set type --feature the arguments default is always False!

2

Simplest & most correct way is:

from distutils.util import strtobool parser.add_argument('--feature', dest='feature', type=lambda x: bool(strtobool(x))) 

Do note that True values are y, yes, t, true, on and 1; false values are n, no, f, false, off and 0. Raises ValueError if val is anything else.

1

I was looking for the same issue, and imho the pretty solution is :

def str2bool(v): return v.lower() in ("yes", "true", "t", "1") 

and using that to parse the string to boolean as suggested above.

2

This works for everything I expect it to:

add_boolean_argument(parser, 'foo', default=True) parser.parse_args([]) # Whatever the default was parser.parse_args(['--foo']) # True parser.parse_args(['--nofoo']) # False parser.parse_args(['--foo=true']) # True parser.parse_args(['--foo=false']) # False parser.parse_args(['--foo', '--nofoo']) # Error 

The code:

def _str_to_bool(s): """Convert string to bool (in argparse context).""" if s.lower() not in ['true', 'false']: raise ValueError('Need bool; got %r' % s) return {'true': True, 'false': False}[s.lower()] def add_boolean_argument(parser, name, default=False): """Add a boolean argument to an ArgumentParser instance.""" group = parser.add_mutually_exclusive_group() group.add_argument( '--' + name, nargs='?', default=default, const=True, type=_str_to_bool) group.add_argument('--no' + name, dest=name, action='store_false') 
1

In addition to what @mgilson said, it should be noted that there's also a ArgumentParser.add_mutually_exclusive_group(required=False) method that would make it trivial to enforce that --flag and --no-flag aren't used at the same time.

0

Simplest. It's not flexible, but I prefer simplicity.

 parser.add_argument('--boolean_flag', help='This is a boolean flag.', type=eval, choices=[True, False], default='True') 

EDIT: If you don't trust the input, don't use eval.

7

This is actually outdated. For Python 3.7+, Argparse now supports boolean args (search BooleanOptionalAction).

The implementation looks like this:

import argparse ap = argparse.ArgumentParser() # List of args ap.add_argument('--foo', default=True, type=bool, help='Some helpful text that is not bar. Default = True') # Importable object args = ap.parse_args() 

One other thing to mention: this will block all entries other than True and False for the argument via argparse.ArgumentTypeError. You can create a custom error class for this if you want to try to change this for any reason.

5

A simpler way would be to use as below.

parser.add_argument('--feature', type=lambda s: s.lower() in ['true', 't', 'yes', '1']) 

After previously following @akash-desarda 's excellence answer , to use strtobool via lambda, later, I decide to use strtobool directly instead.

import argparse from distutils import util parser.add_argument('--feature', type=util.strtobool) 

Yes you're right, strtobool is returning an int, not a bool. But strtobool will not returning any other value except 0 and 1, and python will get them converted to a bool value seamlessy and consistently.

>>> 0 == False True >>> 0 == True False >>> 1 == False False >>> 1 == True True 

While on receiving a wrong input value like

python yours.py --feature wrong_value 

An argparse.Action with strtobool compared to lambda will produce a slightly clearer/comprehensible error message:

yours.py: error: argument --feature: invalid strtobool value: 'wrong_value' 

Compared to this code,

parser.add_argument('--feature', type=lambda x: bool(util.strtobool(x)) 

Which will produce a less clear error message:

yours.py: error: argument --feature: invalid <lambda> value: 'wrong_value' 

Simplest way would be to use choices:

parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() parser.add_argument('--my-flag',choices=('True','False')) args = parser.parse_args() flag = args.my_flag == 'True' print(flag) 

Not passing --my-flag evaluates to False. The required=True option could be added if you always want the user to explicitly specify a choice.

As an improvement to @Akash Desarda 's answer, you could do

import argparse from distutils.util import strtobool parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() parser.add_argument("--foo", type=lambda x:bool(strtobool(x)), nargs='?', const=True, default=False) args = parser.parse_args() print(args.foo) 

And it supports python test.py --foo

(base) [costa@costa-pc code]$ python test.py False (base) [costa@costa-pc code]$ python test.py --foo True (base) [costa@costa-pc code]$ python test.py --foo True True (base) [costa@costa-pc code]$ python test.py --foo False False 

I think the most canonical way will be:

parser.add_argument('--ensure', nargs='*', default=None) ENSURE = config.ensure is None 

Quick and easy, but only for arguments 0 or 1:

parser.add_argument("mybool", default=True,type=lambda x: bool(int(x))) myargs=parser.parse_args() print(myargs.mybool) 

The output will be "False" after calling from terminal:

python myscript.py 0 
1
class FlagAction(argparse.Action): # From def __init__(self, option_strings, dest, default=None, required=False, help=None, metavar=None, positive_prefixes=['--'], negative_prefixes=['--no-']): self.positive_strings = set() self.negative_strings = set() for string in option_strings: assert re.match(r'--[A-z]+', string) suffix = string[2:] for positive_prefix in positive_prefixes: self.positive_strings.add(positive_prefix + suffix) for negative_prefix in negative_prefixes: self.negative_strings.add(negative_prefix + suffix) strings = list(self.positive_strings | self.negative_strings) super(FlagAction, self).__init__(option_strings=strings, dest=dest, nargs=0, const=None, default=default, type=bool, choices=None, required=required, help=help, metavar=metavar) def __call__(self, parser, namespace, values, option_string=None): if option_string in self.positive_strings: setattr(namespace, self.dest, True) else: setattr(namespace, self.dest, False) 

Similar to @Akash but here is another approach that I've used. It uses str than lambda because python lambda always gives me an alien-feelings.

import argparse from distutils.util import strtobool parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() parser.add_argument("--my_bool", type=str, default="False") args = parser.parse_args() if bool(strtobool(args.my_bool)) is True: print("OK") 

just do the following , you can make --test = True by using

python filename --test

parser.add_argument("--test" , default=False ,help="test ?", dest='test', action='store_true') 
1

Convert the value:

def __arg_to_bool__(arg): """__arg_to_bool__ Convert string / int arg to bool :param arg: argument to be converted :type arg: str or int :return: converted arg :rtype: bool """ str_true_values = ( '1', 'ENABLED', 'ON', 'TRUE', 'YES', ) str_false_values = ( '0', 'DISABLED', 'OFF', 'FALSE', 'NO', ) if isinstance(arg, str): arg = arg.upper() if arg in str_true_values: return True elif arg in str_false_values: return False if isinstance(arg, int): if arg == 1: return True elif arg == 0: return False if isinstance(arg, bool): return arg # if any other value not covered above, consider argument as False # or you could just raise and error return False [...] args = ap.parse_args() my_arg = options.my_arg my_arg = __arg_to_bool__(my_arg) 

Expanding on gerardw's answer

The reason parser.add_argument("--my_bool", type=bool) doesn't work is that bool("mystring") is True for any non-empty string so bool("False") is actually True.

What you want is

my_program.py

import argparse parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="My parser") parser.add_argument( "--my_bool", choices=["False", "True"], ) parsed_args = parser.parse_args() my_bool = parsed_args.my_bool == "True" print(my_bool) 
$ python my_program.py --my_bool False False $ python my_program.py --my_bool True True $ python my_program.py --my_bool true usage: my_program.py [-h] [--my_bool {False,True}] my_program.py: error: argument --my_bool: invalid choice: 'true' (choose from 'False', 'True') 

You Might Also Like