What is the difference between git rm --cached and git reset ?

According to the git rm documentation,

--cached Use this option to unstage and remove paths only from the index. Working tree files, whether modified or not, will be left alone. 

But according to this resource unstaging a file is done with

git reset HEAD <file> 

What is the difference? Is there one?

2

2 Answers

With git rm --cached you stage a file for removal, but you don't remove it from the working dir. The file will then be shown as untracked.

Take a test drive

git init test_repo cd test_repo touch test git add test git commit -m 'Added file test git rm --cached test git status Changes to be committed: (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage) deleted: test <---- staged for removal Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) test <-- still in the working dir 

With git reset <file> you can unstage a file. In the example above you might want to use git reset test to unstage the removal.

git reset test git status On branch master nothing to commit, working directory clean 

The command with flag git rm --cached removes the file from the index but leaves it in the working directory. This indicates to git that you don't want to track the file any more.

On the other hand, the command git reset HEAD <file> leaves the file as a tracked file in the index, but the modifications cached in the index are lost. This has the effect as if the file in cache had been over written by the file in HEAD (while the working tree file is untouched).

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like